• Join Us for the International Conference on Shared Parenting Boston, May 29-31, 2017

    Join Us for the International Conference on Shared Parenting Boston, May 29-31, 2017

    read about it here...
  • Mark Your Calendar for the 2017 International Conference on Shared Parenting!

    Mark Your Calendar for the 2017 International Conference on Shared Parenting!

    learn more...

Sign Up

  • Sign Up
    Get weekly e-mails about the latest family law changes, join calls to action, or volunteer.
More Info

DONATE

  • Make a Contribution
    We will put your contribution to use to make shared parenting the norm and to reform family law.
More Info

Achievements

  • Achievements
    National Parents Organization affiliates are making great progress across the Unites States.
More Info

NPO Newsroom

  • NPO Newsroom
    National Parents Organization continues to receive high-impact media coverage from top news sources.
More Info

NPO Blog

Bolch Reads a Study! Sort of...

December 4, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

We now know that John Bolch has heard of social science. Not only that, we know he’s read a study on the social science on the influence of fathers on children’s welfare. That would be a bit more impressive if he’d draw the correct conclusions from having read the study. It would be even more impressive if the experience would spur him to read more on the subject. The man has demonstrated repeatedly that he doesn’t know the first thing about that science but nevertheless feels competent to opine on parenting and children’s welfare.

 

Too Many British Children Taken Into Care

December 2, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

I often criticize The Guardian and rightly so. Indeed, if the liberal paper’s circulation continues as it has for the past six years, it’ll close its doors entirely in the not-too-distant future. Apparently I’m not alone in my criticism.

Still, on those infrequent occasions when The Guardian gets it right, it’s only just to say so, and this is one of those times (Guardian, 11//16).

 

Marotta Wins at the Trial Court

December 1, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

I’m surprised, but William Marotta won. The State of Kansas may well appeal the trial court’s ruling, but, for now at least, Marotta won’t have to pay child support for his biological child. Here’s my last post on the case.

In a nutshell, Marotta answered an ad placed on Craigslist by two women, … and … who were seeking a sperm donor in order to have a child. The three entered into a written agreement to the effect that he would pursue no legal rights to the child and the women would not pursue him for child support. They paid Marotta for his donation, a child was conceived and was brought into the world. All three adults scrupulously adhered to the bargain they’d struck.

 

Virulent Anti-Dad Rhetoric in the Irish Press

November 30, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

I’ve written several times about the plight of fathers, particularly single fathers, in Ireland. The simple truth is that, if dads in the U.S., England, Australia and Canada think family courts treat them badly, they haven’t seen anything yet. The law on fathers’ rights in Ireland requires single fathers to file a lawsuit in court just to get recognition of their rights as fathers. Failure to do that and their rights are entirely governed by their children’s mothers.

 

Organization Women Against Paternity Fraud Demands DNA Testing at Birth

November 28, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

I’ve often written that DNA testing should be routinely performed on children at birth to insure that the man who’s been named as the father and who believes he’s the father actually is the father. Doing so would entail some cost at first, but the benefits would be far greater. Routine genetic testing would cut the incidence of paternity fraud to essentially zero. That would mean that all children would know to a certainty who their father is and every father would know his children. There would be no lawsuits to clog the courts regarding paternity, no medical errors based on the assumption of paternity, no biological dads appearing years later in the child’s life to claim their rights and no men who’d played the role of father unexpectedly exiting that life. Plus, as a matter of principle, state governments and Washington would no longer be in the business of abetting a mother’s fraud against two men and a child.


See more National Parents Organization blog posts