• 50 States Review - Glaring Parental Inequality
    50 States Review - Glaring Parental Inequality State-by-State analysis highlights parental inequality across the nation  
    State Scorecards...
  • Raise Your Voice!
    Raise Your Voice! Join National Parents Organization in building a powerful affiliate in your state.
    join us...
  • A Community of Activists
    A Community of Activists Our ultimate goal is shared parenting in every state. This helps address a host of financial, custody, and alienation issues the family courts address.
    read more...
  • Building Powerful Affiliates
    Building Powerful Affiliates Our organization and your strong volunteer leadership are key to growing our national membership across the United States.

Sign Up

  • Sign Up
    Get weekly e-mails about the latest family law changes, join calls to action, or volunteer.
More Info

DONATE

  • Make a Contribution
    We will put your contribution to use to make shared parenting the norm and to reform family law.
More Info

Achievements

  • Achievements
    National Parents Organization affiliates are making great progress across the Unites States.
More Info

NPO Newsroom

  • NPO Newsroom
    National Parents Organization continues to receive high-impact media coverage from top news sources.
More Info

Australian Family Courts Ignorant of the Effects of Their Orders

February 10, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

Not long ago, Australian Senator John Madigan and six other senators signed a letter vowing to reform family courts there “root and branch.” This video is of Madigan apparently beginning that process. Here’s his press release on the matter.

The video is of Madigan questioning Family Court CEO, Richard Foster, in the hearing room of the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee. It’s just 6 ½ minutes of Q & A, and the answers are both unsurprising and telling.

 

The New Yorker Tilts at the Children’s Welfare System, Misses

February 8, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

In its February 1 edition, The New Yorker’s Jill Lepore took on the issue of children’s welfare agencies and how they so often get wrong the one job they’re tasked with doing – protection of children. Lepore’s article weighed in at a hefty 7,500 words. With all those keystrokes, you’d think she’d have gotten a lot more right than she did, but alas it was not to be. She nails a couple of issues, but only a couple. Her effort rates a C- that’s probably too generous.

 

Missouri Affiliate Files Shared Parenting Bills in State House and Senate

February 7, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

NPO’s contact person in Missouri, Linda Reutzel, brings us up to date on the progress of our two companion shared parenting bills in the state House and Senate. Here’s the House Bill. She’s cautiously optimistic about their chances for passage. Here’s her message to me followed by her update.

The Missouri legislature has two new companion Shared Parenting Bills this 2016 session. The house bill, HB 2055, is sponsored by Representative Kathryn Swan and the Senate bill, SB 964, is sponsored by Senator Wayne Wallingford. Both use the same language to make clear, that children of divorce or separation, want and need equal access to both FIT and WILLING parents; the bills make it clear that equal access to both FIT and WILLING parents IS in the best interest of children. This language change is a small one to our Statutes, but a very important one in the lives of our children. Research and common sense show that children want and need equal access to both parents and their extended families. It's in their DNA! 

 

New York Child Protection Courts: ‘Absurd Levels of Dysfunction’

February 5, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

The picture I paint of the child welfare system isn’t pretty, but it’s also incomplete. This article fills in one of the key gaps, but, alas, doesn’t improve the picture (ProPublica, 2/2/16). Indeed, it’s all of a piece with what I’ve said so many times before.

It’s about the New York City court system that is tasked with dealing with child protection cases. The article is mostly an interview with Abigail Kramer, a journalist who studied the child welfare courts in New York and wrote a report for the New School’s Center for New York City Affairs. Perhaps what best conveys the state of those courts is the fact that, when Kramer describes their “absurd levels of dysfunction,” it’s a compliment. She’s trying to express how they’ve changed for the better.

 

What Does the Super Bowl Mean to You? It Means Something Special to Pantene

February 4, 2016 by Robert Franklin, Esq, Member, National Board of Directors, National Parents Organization

The Super Bowl is fast approaching, and that means…

What? You could fill in the blank with a hundred different things. Far too much airtime devoted to pointless football trivia, what LeBron James tweeted to Cam Newton, an ever-more grandiose half-time show, or practically anything you could imagine. But one thing that Super Bowl weekend means that you almost certainly didn’t imagine is this: a long-time shared parenting advocate’s work would make up the basis for Super Bowl ads for a major product line.


See more National Parents Organization blog posts