Victory---Damaging Bill from Opponents of Recognizing Parental Alienation Defeated!
Fathers and Families and its legislative allies have succeeded in killing one of the worst family law bills in modern history--California's AB 612. The bill, put forward by the well-funded advocacy group Center for Judicial Excellence (and supported by the California National Organization for Women), would have banned Parental Alienation from being mentioned in any way, shape, or form in a California family court. Because of California's tremendous influence in shaping the laws of other states, this loss would have led to a mushrooming of similarly damaging legislation in other states. Fathers and Families' legislative representative Michael Robinson helped cobble together a coalition of family law professional organizations and experts to oppose the bill. We were able to bottle the bill up in the Senate Judiciary Committee last year and keep it there until last week, when it died. To learn more about the bill, see our co-authored column Preventing courts from considering parental alienation will harm kids (Capitol Weekly, 2/25/10). The defeat of AB 612 is a victory for the family court reform movement and for children everywhere. Victories cost money, as does our deep, professional involvement inside the political system---please support our successful work by making a tax-deductible contribution by clicking here. This is the second time in two months that Fathers & Families has been instrumental in defeating a Center for Judicial Excellence bill---in June, we helped kill AB 2475, which was also related to Parental Alienation. To learn more, see F & F Helps Defeat Radical Bill from Opponents of Recognizing Parental Alienation. Whereas Fathers & Families' family court reform bills have been moving swiftly through the California legislature, the Center for Judicial Excellence is now 0-2 in the 2009-2010 legislative session. The CJE claims that there"s a "crisis' in family courts, and that courts are handing over custody of children to physically and sexually abusive fathers. They promote reforms which will make it easier to deny parents shared custody or visitation rights based on unsubstantiated abuse claims. As we've noted before, there is no empirical basis supporting this claim. The vast majority of the cases that groups like the CJE put forward as alleged examples of this "crisis" of abusive fathers winning child custody are being badly misrepresented--to learn more, click here. The events surrounding AB 2475 and AB 612 are further validation of Fathers and Families' emphasis on the need for the family court reform movement to employ full-time legislative representatives and engage in the political process on a professional level. To support this work with your tax-deductible gift, please click here. Together with you in the love of our children, Glenn Sacks, MA Executive Director, Fathers and Families Ned Holstein, M.D., M.S. Chair of the Board, Fathers and Families